Response to Criticism Over Language on AIPAC

Some members of the Jewish community, including Democratic Congressman Josh Gottheimer, were alarmed by the language used at a rally the previous week, where AIPAC was called "monsters" who move dark money. These are phrases that invoke old anti-Semitic tropes and conspiracy theories. When asked what he would say to those concerned that such language is dangerous, Zohran Mamdani responded by reframing the context of the criticism.

The Gaza Casualty Count and the Status Quo

Mamdani stated he wanted to be very clear about the status quo in which the criticism arose: children are being killed on a daily basis. More than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed by the Israeli military since the so-called ceasefire. He cited the specific case of Al Jazeera journalist Ahmed Wishah, who was killed the previous Saturday by an Israeli strike. Against this backdrop, Mamdani argued that his criticism of AIPAC must be understood as a response to an organization that has been supportive of this status quo and has fought any attempt to actually deliver safety to people, not just in Palestine but throughout much of the region.

AIPAC's Role in Defending the Status Quo

Mamdani characterized the status quo as one of immorality, which he said he would not accept. He explained that when it comes to the way AIPAC defends the status quo, it often does so through direct contributions, such as those being seen in New York 13. He also noted that AIPAC supports the status quo through dark money—by filtering money that would have previously been directly from AIPAC through other shell organizations whose contributors' identities are only made clear after an election. Mamdani concluded by arguing that when asking how such death and destruction happens overseas, it is important to name those who allow it to take place.